If after reading the previous post on positivism and interpretativism philosophy you think that choicing one or another is still unrealistic in practice you might be interesting on adopting the view of pragmatism. This view argues that more important than the research philosophy is the research question. The pragmatism view also argues that is perfectly possible to work with combination of “resources” and “feeling” researchers´ views, as well as the combination of both objectivist and subjectivist philosophy. Consequently, it mixes methods, both qualitative and quantitative, something which is, actually, very recomendable.
Tashakkori and Teddlie (1998) suggest that it is more appropiate for the researcher in a particular study to think of the philosophy adopted as a continuum rather than opposite positions.
- Working at theory level when #formulatingaresearch ? (researchmethodsgdansk.wordpress.com)
- How to turn your research question into your research objectives (researchmethodsgdansk.wordpress.com)
- How to turn a research idea into a research question when #formulatingaresearch (researchmethodsgdansk.wordpress.com)